MINIMUM THICKNESS FOR REPAIR GIRTH WELDS
IN CORRODED
The
minimum weldable thickness is numerically assessed in this work, as a function
of pressure during the welding operations of a corroded gas pipeline, according
to the approach by Battelle. The minimum weldable thickness is found to
increase when the flow rate of the transported gas in the section being
repaired increases. Integrtity of the reapairs is assessed, and alternative
measures to momentarily increase the flow in the area of the repair are
evaluated. .
1.- INTRODUCTION
Companies transporting natural gas have thousands of
miles of buried pipes, which date back to the 40’s and 50’s. At that time,
protection techniques against corrosion (e.g. protective coatings and cathodic
protection) were not well developed, and the companies commonly face defects
due to corrosion degradation. Worlwide the most common way to repair gas
leakage is to change the defective portion of the pipe. To do this, however, it
is necessary to stop pumping gas and vent the affected portion of the line.
Where there are no loops to deviate the gas flow, doing this means stopping
provision of gas to some areas, with the consequent losses to the users and the
transporting company. One of the alternatives available to minimize service losses
and restore serviceability of corroded lines is the use of full encirclement
sleeve repairs.
Full encirclement welded sleeves are used to repair
defects in underground gas pipelines, see Figure 1. The reinforcements
consist of two half sleeves welded lengthwise, which are also welded
circumferentially to the pipe if there is a gas leakage or other severe
defects. Standard designs are found in API RP 1107 [1] . These reinforcements
habitually are carried out in areas where local loss of thickness or gas leakage
are detected, generally due to corrosion. When a through-the-thickness defect
is detected, reinforcements with O'ring and venting valve are used to prevent
gas form reaching the welding operations. This kind of repair requires a
circumferential (girth) fillet weld to the pipe, to prevent gas leakage during
subsequent service. The possibility of repairing gas leaks is probably the most
important advantage of welded sleeve repairs over competeing techniques, such
as clock springs [2].
In-field welding of these sleeves is
normally a difficult task. Usually, short times and poor soil or weather
conditions make cutting, handling and welding the sleeves to the buried pipes
require especially trained personnel and equipment. It is no surpris e,
therefore, that several weld repairs fail in different ways. These failures
have in many cases been the driving force for changes and improvements in the fabrication of the sleeves, field welding procedures and non
destructive testing of the repairs.
If not properly trained, due to the fear to burn
through the pipe, welders tend to minimise the welding time and use high
depostion rates, which are obtained with cellulosic electrodes. The use of
cellulosic-coated electrodes is a common
practice in the construction of pipelines but for welds made onto in-service
pipelines there is a serious risk of reduction in ductilility and toughness by
Hydrogen Cracking [3] the specification of low-hygroscopic basic electrodes is
now recommended, along with specified preheats and heat imputs to avoid high
cooling rates and burn through [4] .
The occurrence of burn through
during the circumferencial reinforcement-to-pipe weld is governed by the
thickness of the pipe being welded and the penetration of the molten pool
during welding. Weld penetration depends on weld heat input, heat dissipation
along the pipe and the reinforcement, and the dissipation through the gases
inside (natual gas) and around (air) the pipe. This last dissipation depends
upon temperature and flow parameters, pressure and flow tate. The controlling
parameter is the gas flow rate.
No comments:
Post a Comment